Collier-Magar & Roberts

Attorneys, Bankruptcy Law Attorneys, Business Law Attorneys

Be the first to review!

OPEN NOW

Today: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

(317) 261-1885Call

Add Website

Map & DirectionsDirections151 N Delaware StIndianapolis, IN 46204 Write a ReviewWrite Review

Is this your business?

Customize this page.

Claim This Business

Hours

Regular Hours

Mon - Fri:	9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Places Near Indianapolis with Attorneys

Beech Grove (8 miles)
Broad Ripple (11 miles)
Broad Ripple Village (11 miles)

More Info

Neighborhood: Downtown Indianapolis
Categories: Attorneys, Bankruptcy Law Attorneys, Business Law Attorneys, Business Litigation Attorneys, Corporation & Partnership Law Attorneys, Employee Benefits & Worker Compensation Attorneys, Employment Discrimination Attorneys, Legal Service Plans, Malpractice Law Attorneys, Medical Malpractice Attorneys, Professional Liability & Negligence Law Attorneys, Real Estate Attorneys, Traffic Law Attorneys, Workers Compensation Assistance, Wrongful Death Attorneys

Gallery

Be the first to add a photo!

Reviews

Hi there!
Be the first to review!

Click to Rate

Details

Phone: (317) 261-1885

Address: 151 N Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN 46204

People Also Viewed

View similar Attorneys

Suggest an Edit

Collier-Magar & Roberts

Wrongful Death
Traffic Violations
Hameetman v. City of Chicago, 776 F.2d 636, 641 (7th Cir.1985), “The Constitution does not require states to enforce their laws (or cities their ordinances) with Prussian thoroughness as the price of being allowed to enforce them at all. Otherwise few speeders would have to pay traffic tickets. Selective, incomplete enforcement of the law is the norm in this country.”

Business and Corporate Law

Business Formation
Business Disputes

Workers Compensation
Weiss acknowledges Outlaw was a workers compensation case but asserts, without explanation or citation to authority, that “the court’s analysis of the specificity required for findings of fact applies equally to finds [sic] of fact made by a trial court.” (Appellants’ Br. at 11.) We decline to so hold.
Wrongful Termination
Collier-Magar, P.C. is a multi-faceted civil litigation firm with a focus on representing municipalities, public entities and businesses. The attorneys of Collier-Magar, P.C. are versed in all forms of civil litigation. Our professionals provide a full range of legal services to clients in administrative hearings and state and federal trials and appeals. The firm has a substantial practice in the areas of insurance defense, employment law, civil rights litigation, business litigation and counseling, and all varieties of governmental liability claims including law enforcement defense, search and seizure and use of force claims, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, freedom of speech and freedom of association claims, and all constitutional and statutory civil rights claims.
Employment Discrimination

Premises Liability
Ken Collier-Magar, a partner of Collier-Magar, P.C., is an experienced litigator who aggressively advocates for his clients. Ken focuses his practice on complex litigation representing businesses, public officials, and Indiana governmental entities. He has represented clients in numerous jury trials in both federal and state court. His experience is extensive and includes claims involving premises liability, zoning matters, road signage and design, emergency vehicle responses, unlawful search and seizure, the use of force by law enforcement, including deadly force cases, due process concerns, discrimination claims based on race, sex, disability, age, and speech, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims, and a variety of other constitutional and statutory claims under the various Civil Rights Acts. He has represented small, medium, and large corporations, as well as counties, cities, towns, public officials, and law enforcement officers throughout the state of Indiana.
Land Use and Zoning

Medical Malpractice
10 Weiss also asserts, without explanation or citation to authority, that “[t]his additional specificity should include identification of... what ‘repairs’ are necessary to correct those defects.” (Appellant’s Br. at 13.) We decline to impose on the trial court an obligation to so micromanage the remediation of the defects in the Harper home. As the Harpers correctly note, this is an action for damages for Weiss’ breach, and not an action for specific performance. The trial court was not obliged in this action for damages to explain how to repair each problem, just as a trial court in a medical malpractice case would not be obliged to advise a physician or physical therapist how he or she might treat a plaintiff’s medical problems resulting from the malpractice.

Foreclosure
On October 24, 2005, Wolfe filed a complaint to foreclose the mechanic’s lien. On November 9, 2005, Eagle Ridge filed an answer to the complaint and also filed a counterclaim, alleging that it suffered damages because of Wolfe’s refusal to release the lien and because of Wolfe’s poor workmanship on the construction project. On September 18, 2006, the trial court entered judgment of $13,917.14 in favor of Eagle Ridge, and against Wolfe on his foreclosure complaint. The $13,917.14 included $1,415.00 on Eagle Ridge’s poor workmanship claim2 and $12,502.14 for Wolfe’s refusal to release the mechanic’s lien. That amount included $11,622.30 representing the additional interest Eagle Ridge must pay for five years on the Fifth Third mortgage by reason of the interest rate being 7.5% instead of 6.99%, $750.00 in attorney fees Fifth Third charged Eagle Ridge because of being named a defendant in Wolfe’s foreclosure suit, and $129.84 representing interest on the $6,200.00 Eagle Ridge had to deposit in escrow in order to close the mortgage. The trial court refused Eagle Ridge’s request, made at trial, to require Wolfe to pay its attorney fees because Wolfe’s lawsuit allegedly was frivolous. Wolfe now appeals, and Eagle Ridge cross-appeals.

View All Services

Provided by