Steele, George, JD

I agree totally with lilypad: I used George Steele in the past, and I was left with the feeling that he didn't really care if I was innocent he just wanted me to take the best deal offered by the prosecutor and the case to be over and him paid. [even though I was totally innocent] A few times I had to LET HIM KNOW I WAS INNOCENT until proven guilty... Fortunately my case was dismissed but it had little to do with Mr. Steele.

---------------------------



lilypad wrote: IneffectivePosted by lilypad on 04/30/2008



Did not present witnesses, nor key evidence given him to show jury. Lousy communications with client but liked my money. Did not "defend." Left with feeling of "hung out there.' Felt the decision of my fate was already decided between Mr. Steele, Judge, and Prosecuter. Did not communicate the conditions after my trial. Instead, withdrew from case. Mr. Steele was a prosecutor in the past. Find a REAL DEFENSE LAWYER. Court is long enough. My case took near a year to complete and I became the "victim." Fairness is NOT the objective. Money is.

Did not present witnesses, nor key evidence given him to show jury. Lousy communications with client but liked my money. Did not "defend." Left with feeling of "hung out there.' Felt the decision of my fate was already decided between Mr. Steele, Judge, and Prosecuter. Did not communicate the conditions after my trial. Instead, withdrew from case. Mr. Steele was a prosecutor in the past. Find a REAL DEFENSE LAWYER. Court is long enough. My case took near a year to complete and I became the "victim." Fairness is NOT the objective. Money is.